Yoga - What is Yoga?Yoga Course Offerings - Yoga Courses at SVYASAYoga Training & Research DivisionsArogyadhama - Yoga Research Health HomeA leading Yoga Research InstitutionYoga LibraryEvents @ SVYASAAbout SVYASA and VYASA
 
Yoga » Yoga University » Yoga Library » Yoga Research Papers » Yoga and Life Sciences
Yoga Research Papers published by SVYASA

 
RESULTS


The group mean values ± SD for all the parameters have been given in Table 1.

Two Factor ANOVA
The two factor ANOVA revealed a significant difference between the “before” and “after” values of skin resistance-SR (viz Factor B = before test period versus after test period), [F = 8.54, F 0.02 (2) 1,44 = 7.24 hence P < 0.021, here (as well as below) the “F” value for DF 44 has been

Table 1. Autonomic Variables Before and After Surya anuloma pranayama (SAV) and Normal breathing (NB) values are groupes Mean ± SD, Number of subjects = 12.
 

*p < 0.05, paired t-test, “after” compared to “before”
**p< 0.01, paired t-test, “after” compared to “before” @ p< 0.05, Tukey test,
 

derived by linear interpolation (Zar, 1984) from the values for DF = 40 and DF = 45, given in a standard table. The multiple comparison Tukey test revealed a significant difference between the mean SR value after SAV compared to the mean value before SAV (q = 3.91, where q .05 (2) 4, 40 = 3.79, hence P < 0.05). Here 40 is the next value listed on the standard table where 44 is not listed.

For the systolic BP, interaction between Factor A (SAV versus NB) and Factor B (before versus after), i.e., A X B was significant [ F = 4.54, F 0.05 (1) 1, 44 = 4.06, hence P < 0.0,5 ]. However, there was no significant effect of either Factors A or B independently (P > 0.2, in both cases, DF as described above). There was no significant effect of either of the Factors (A or B) or of the interaction between them (A X B) for the remaining parameters (P > 0.2 in all cases, DF as described above). The multiple comparison Tukey test did not reveal a significant difference in the comparison of the group mean values for these parameters (for all parameters q < 2.50, DF as described above for SR, hence P > 0.1).

Paired t test
The paired t test revealed a significant decrease (45.7%) in digit pulse volume (DPV) following SAV (P < 0.05), with no significant change after NB. There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase of 17% in the oxygen consumption (OC) after SAV and in the systolic blood pressure after SAV sessions by an average of 9.4 mm HG (P < 0.05), but not after NB sessions. The skin resistance (SR) was significantly reduced after both SAV and NB sessions (P < 0.001, in both cases). The change was greater after SAV sessions (60%), compared to a 31% decrease after NB sessions. However, this difference was not statistically significant [ q = 1.72, where q 0.5 (2) 4, 40 = 1.996, hence P > 0.5 ].

There were no significant changes in the other parameters after either SAV or NB sessions, compared to before (P > 0. 1) in all cases)

  
 

 
 
Main
  Abstract
  Keywords
  Introduction
Method
  Subjects
  Design of the study
  Assessment
  Data acquisition and analyses
  Pranayama (SAV) and normal breathing (NB)
Results
Discussion
References
You do not have permission to sell or distribute or reproduce Research @ SVYASA Papers text or any portion of the text in any form (printed, electronic or otherwise). To do so is a violation of copyright law

Research Contributions of
SVYASA
(2 Volumes)
PRINT EDITION
US $ 33.00

Write to svyasa@svyasa.org


Apply for
PhD
at
SVYASA
Click here
       
    PDF    
   
     
   
Research Papers Feed
     
   
About US | Contact Us | Feedback | Donate | Press | Careers | Code | Whitepaper