1. Laurent-Vannier A, Chevignard M, Pradat-Diehl P, Abada G, De Agostini
M. Assessment of unilateral spatial neglect in children using the Teddy Bear Cancellation Test. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:120-5.
2. Ruff RM, Evans RW, Light RH. Automatic detection vs controlled search: A
paper and pencil approach. Percept Mot Skills 1986;62:407-516.
3. Halligan PW, Wilson B, Cockburn J. A short screening test for visual neglect
in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:95-9.
4. Lowery N, Ragland JD, Gur RC, Gur RE, Moberg PJ. Normative data for
the symbol cancellation test in young healthy adults. Appl Neuropsychol
2004;11:218-21.
5. Lowery N, Ragland JD, Gur RC, Gur RE, Moberg PJ. Normative data for
the symbol cancellation test in young healthy adults. Appl Neuropsychol
2004;11:218-21.
6. Lauer CJ, Gorzewski B, Gerlinghoff M, Backmund H, Zihl J.
Neuropsychological assessment before and after treatment in patients with
anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. J Psychiatr Res 1999;33:129-38.
7. Rosselli M, Ardila A, Rosas P. Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates.
Brain Cogn 1990;12:281-96.
8. Kapczinski F, Curran HV, Przemioslo R, Williams R, Fluck E, Fernandes C,
et al. Cognitive impairments of alcoholic cirrhotic patients: Correlation with
endogenous benzodiazepine receptor ligands and increased afÞ nity of platelet
receptors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:676-80.
9. Richer F, Decary A, Lapierre MF, Rouleau I, Bouvier G, Saint-Hilaire JM.
Target detection deÞ cits in frontal lobectomy. Brain Cogn 1993;21:203-11.
10. Sandson TA, Bachna KJ, Morin MD. Right hemisphere dysfunction in
ADHD: Visual hemispatial attention and clinical subtype. J Learn Disabil
2000;33:83-90.
11. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford
University Press; 1995.
12. Geldmacher DS. Effect of stimulus number, and target-to-distractor ratio,
on the performance of random array letter-cancellation tasks. Brain Cogn
1996;32:405-15.
13. Amieva H, Lafont S, Dartigues JF, Fabrigoule C. Selective attention in
Alzheimer’s disease: Analysis of errors in Zazzo’s cancellation task. Brain
Cogn 1999;40:26-9.
14. Casco C, Tressoldi PE, Dellantonio A. Visual selective attention and reading
efficiency are related in children. Cortex 1998;34:531-46.
15. Adair JC, Na DL, Schwarz RL, Heilman KM. Analysis of primary and
secondary inß uences on spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 1998;37:351-67.
16. Aglioti S, Smania N, Barbieri C, Corbetta M. Inß uence of stimulus salience
and attentional demands on visual search patterns in hemispatial neglect.
Brain Cogn 1997;34:388-403.
17. Na DL, Adair JC, Kang Y, Chung CS, Lee KH, Heilman KM. Motor
perseveration behavior on a line cancellation task. Neurology 1999;52:
1569-76.
18. Lowery N, Ragland JD, Gur RC, Gur, RE. Moberg PJ. Normative data for the symbol cancellation test in young healthy adults. Appl Neuropsychol
2004;11:218-21.
19. Natu MV, Agarawal AK. Testing of stimulant effects of coffee on the
psychomotor performance: An exercise in clinical pharmacology. Indian J
Physiol Pharmacol 1997;29:11-4.
20. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression diagnostics: Identifying the
influential data and source of collinearity. New York: Wiley; 1980.
21. Sarang PS, Telles S. Comparison of psychological effect of two yoga
relaxation techniques, Ph.D. Thesis; 2006.
22. Agarwal AK, Kalra R, Natu MV, Dadhich AP, Deswa RS. Psychomotor
performance of psychiatric inpatients under therapy: Assessment by paper
and pencil test. Hum Psycopharmacol Clin Exp 2002;172:91-93.
23. Natu MV, Agarawal AK. Testing of stimulant effects of coffee on the psychomotor performance: An exercise in clinical pharmacology. Indian J
Physiol Pharmacol 1997;29:11-4.
24. Sarang SP, Telles S. Immediate effect of two yoga-based relaxation techniques
on performance in a letter-cancellation task. Percept Mot Skills 2007;105:
379-85.
25. Stein J, Walsh V. To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia.
Trends Neurosci 1997;20:147-51.
26. Brannan J, Williams MC. Allocation of visual attention in good and poor
readers. Percept Psychophys 1987;41:23-28.
27. Williams MC, Bologna N. Perceptual grouping in good and poor readers.
Percept Psychophys 1985;38:367-74.
28. Casco C, Prunetti E. Visual search in good and poor readers: Effect
with single and combined features targets. Percept Mot Skills 1996;82:
1155-67.
