| Yoga in Perception and Performance |
|
|
RESULTS
|
The age, stages of disease, grade and node status were
similar in the yoga and supportive therapy (control) groups
[Table 1]. The mean years of education of the study sample
was 12.49 ± 2.67 years, with a minimum of seven years and
a maximum of 17 years of education. The mean overall
age of the subjects was 49.2 ± 9.6 years in both groups. All
subjects had adequate nutritional status with the majority
of them having a body mass index (BMI) between 1925
(57%) and the rest above 25 (43%).
|
|
Measures of mood [Table 2]
|
Participants reported high levels of anxiety at baseline
(before surgery). A paired samples t test done to assess the
changes in anxiety state following surgery within groups
showed a significant decrease in anxiety state following
surgery in both control [t (35) = 6.69, P < 0.001,95%
confidence interval, CI (4.9 to 10.6)] and yoga groups
[t (32) = 6.41, P < 0.001, 95% CI (7.6 to 14.3]. Analysis
of covariance using baseline anxiety states as a covariate showed a significant decrease in anxiety states following
surgery [F (66) = 4.22, P = 0.04, 95%CI (-5.6 to -0.3)], in
the yoga group as compared to controls. STAI trait scores
were initially high in the period between diagnosis and
surgery. A paired samples t test done to assess the changes
in the anxiety trait following surgery within groups
showed a significant decrease in the anxiety trait following
surgery in both control [t (35) = 5.50, P < 0.001, 95% CI
(4.9 to 10.6) ] and yoga groups [t (32) = 6.1, P < 0.001,
95% CI (5.8 to 11.7) ]. ANCOVA using baseline anxiety
trait score showed significant decrease in the anxiety trait
scores following surgery, [F (66) = 9.8, P = 0.002, 95%
CI (-7.2 to -1.7)]. There was no significant within-group
differences following surgery in the depression scores.
Analysis of covariance using baseline depression scores
as a covariate showed a significant decrease in depression
following surgery [F (66) = 7.6, P = 0.008, 95% CI (-4.6
to -0.73)].
|
Measures of quality of life and stress symptoms [Table 3]
|
A paired samples t test showed a significant decrease
in distress in the yoga group alone following surgery
[t (32) = 2.1, P = 0.05, 95% CI (0.006 to 5.7)]. There was
a significant decrease in symptom severity [F (66) = 12.8,
P = 0.001, 95% CI (-5.1 to 1.4)] and distress [F (66) =
13.6, P < 0.01, 95% CI (-6.3 to -1.8)] in the yoga group as
compared to the controls following surgery. There was
no significant within-group differences following surgery
in the quality of life scores. Analysis of covariance using
baseline quality of life scores as a covariate showed
significant improvements in quality of life following surgery [F(66) = 12.34, P = 0.01, 95% CI (4.7 to 19.8)] in
the yoga group as compared to the controls.
|
|
Immune measures
|
Serum immunoglobulins [Table 4]
|
Subjects serum samples were assessed for Immunoglobulins
G, M and A at baseline following surgery. A paired
samples t test showed a significant increase in IgA levels
following surgery in the control group [t (32) = -3.2, P =
0.005, 95% CI (-1.1 to -0.21] but no significant changes
in the yoga group. Analysis of covariance using the
baseline presurgery measure as a covariate also showed a
significant decrease in IgA levels following surgery in the
yoga group [F (62)=10.21, P =0.001] as compared to the
controls. There was no significant within- and between-
group changes in IgM and IgG levels.
|

|
Lymphocyte subsets [Table 5]
|
T Lymphocyte subsets such as CD4+, CD8+ and CD56+
% were assessed before and after four weeks after surgery.
A paired samples t test done to assess the changes in CD56
% following surgery within groups showed a significant
decrease in CD56 % following surgery in the control group
[t (32) = 3.57, P = 0.001), 95% CI (1.85 to 6.76)] but not
in the yoga group. Analysis of variance done on these
post- measures using the baseline measure of CD56 % as
a covariate showed significantly higher levels of CD56
% in the yoga group following surgery [F (62) = 5.78,
P = 0.019] as compared to the controls. A paired samples
t test done to assess the changes in CD4 % following
surgery within groups showed a significant decrease in
CD4 % counts following surgery in the control group
[t (35)= 3.31, P = 0.002, 95% CI (1.62 to 6.72)] but not in
the yoga group. Analysis of variance on post- measures
using baseline measures of CD4 % as a covariate did not
show any significant changes between groups following
surgery. A paired samples t test done to assess the changes
in CD8 % following surgery within groups showed a
significant decrease in CD8 % following surgery in the
control group [t (34) = 3.46, P = 0.001, 95% CI (1.64 to 6.30)] but not in the yoga group. Analysis of variance on
this post- measure using the baseline measure of CD8 % as
a covariate did not show any significant changes between
groups following surgery.
|
|
|
|
You do not have permission to sell or distribute or reproduce
Research @ SVYASA Papers text or any portion of the text in any form (printed, electronic or otherwise). To do so is a violation of copyright law
|
|
|
Research
Contributions of
SVYASA
(2 Volumes)
PRINT EDITION
US $ 33.00 Write to svyasa@svyasa.org |
|