Yoga - What is Yoga?Yoga Course Offerings - Yoga Courses at SVYASAYoga Training & Research DivisionsArogyadhama - Yoga Research Health HomeA leading Yoga Research InstitutionYoga LibraryEvents @ SVYASAAbout SVYASA and VYASASVYASA in the NEWSSVYASA Partners
 
Yoga » Yoga University » Yoga Library » Yoga Research Papers » Yoga and Life Sciences
Yoga Research Papers published by SVYASA


DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND NORMALLY SIGHTED SUBJECTS IN THE P1 COMPONENT OF MIDDLE LATENCY AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS1

R. Nagarathna, H. R. Nagendra, Shirley Telles and K. V. Naveen.
Vivekananda Kendra Yoga Research Foundation

R. Srinivas, K. S. Nirmala
Department of Neurology, Ramaiah Medical College, &Teaching Hospital


Summary: Auditory evoked potentials (0 to 100 msec. range) were recorded two times for 9 congenitally blind children (age= 14.1 yr. ± 1.4 yr.) and 9 age-matched children with normal vision. The groups peak latency and amplitude of the P1 wave were compared. The peak latency was significantly lower for the congenitally blind than for the normally sighted on a two-factor analysis of variance. Since the P1 wave is thought to correspond to either the ascending, reticular activating system or the primary auditory cortex, these results suggest that information processing at these neural levels may occur more efficiently in the blind.

Congenitally blind subjects were reported by Strelow and Brabyn (1982) to show sensitivity in auditory perception, enabling them to use echoes to perceive spatial positions of objects. This interesting result has a neurophysiological basis. The long latency event related potential waves (NI, P2, and P3) showed shorter latencies and larger amplitudes in early blind humans than those with normal vision (Niemeyer & Starlinger, 1981). The Na and Pa components of middle latency auditory evoked potentials were not significantly different in congenitally blind subjects and those with normal vision (Naveen, Srinivas, Nirmala, Nagendra, & Telles, 1997); however, the Nb component (average peak latency 44.3 msec.) had a significantly shorter latency in congenitally blind persons. This suggested that auditory information processing at the level of the posteromedial part of the primary auditory cortex, the known generator of the Nb wave (Liegeois-Chauvel, Musolino, Badier, Marquis, & Chauvel, 1994) was more efficient in the blind.

The present report presents the analysis of the P1 wave in the congenitally blind and subjects with normal vision described above (Naveen, et al. 1997).

 
 
Main
  Summary
  Introduction
Method
  Subjects
  Design of the Study and Testing Procedure
 
Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials, P1 Component
Results and Discussion
References
You do not have permission to sell or distribute or reproduce Research @ SVYASA Papers text or any portion of the text in any form (printed, electronic or otherwise). To do so is a violation of copyright law

Research Contributions of
SVYASA
(2 Volumes)
PRINT EDITION
US $ 33.00

Write to svyasa@svyasa.org


Apply for
PhD
at
SVYASA
Click here
       
    PDF    
   
     
   
Research Papers Feed
     
   
About US | Contact Us | Feedback | Donate | Press | Careers | Code